<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Facultad de ciencias naturales y exactas.</title>
<link href="http://jadimike.unachi.ac.pa/handle/123456789/955" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle>Articulos y documentos de la facultad de ciencias naturales y exactas.</subtitle>
<id>http://jadimike.unachi.ac.pa/handle/123456789/955</id>
<updated>2026-05-05T10:48:48Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-05-05T10:48:48Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Cumplimiento de normas éticas de investigación en las tesis de maestrías en biología elaboradas en  la Universidad Autónoma de Chiriquí.</title>
<link href="http://jadimike.unachi.ac.pa/handle/123456789/956" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Vargas Jiménez, Luis Manuel</name>
</author>
<id>http://jadimike.unachi.ac.pa/handle/123456789/956</id>
<updated>2026-01-19T17:00:36Z</updated>
<published>2023-07-22T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Cumplimiento de normas éticas de investigación en las tesis de maestrías en biología elaboradas en  la Universidad Autónoma de Chiriquí.
Vargas Jiménez, Luis Manuel
In this research, compliance with ethical research standards was reviewed in 41 Master's theses in &#13;
Biology prepared at the Autonomous University of Chiriquí (Panama) from 2002 to 2018. The &#13;
measurement instrument was a checklist of 8 criteria, based on principles ethics of research established &#13;
in current national and international ethical standards. The theses studied were ethically deficient &#13;
overall with 24.3 % compliance with ethical research standards. None of the eight criteria evaluatedreached the level of ethically "excellent". Considering the study subjects, 32.7 % of the theses made on &#13;
human subjects presented good compliance with ethical standards; while the theses made in non human subjects (23.3 %) were deficient. The best evaluated criteria in theses made using human subjects &#13;
were: "scientific validity" (79.1 %), "social value": (56.2 %), "fair selection of participating subjects" (53.1&#13;
%) and " review of informed consent (48.7 %); the worst evaluated were: "author's commitments" (28.9&#13;
%), "respect for the participants" (16.2 %), "favorable risk-benefit balance" (16.2 % and "independent &#13;
review" (10, 4 %). The best evaluated criteria in theses made using non-human subjects were: "scientific &#13;
validity" (75.4 %), "social value": (45.4 %), "fair selection of participating subjects" (40, 5 %); while the &#13;
worst evaluated were: "author's commitments" (27.2 %), "favorable risk-benefit balance" (22.2 %), &#13;
"independent review" (11.9 %), "respect participants" (2.7 %) and "review of informed consent" (1.3 %). &#13;
The lack of an institutional research ethics committee and the non-obligation to submit Master's theses &#13;
in Biology to ethical standards; affects the level of compliance with ethical standards in the theses &#13;
studied.
Universidad Autónoma de Chiriquí
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-07-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
